Today’s science will dismantle the three primary pieces of evidence against Olindo and Rosa.

The Deputy Prosecutor of the Milan Court of Appeal, Cuno Tarfusir, requests the reopening of the Arba massacre file. per page Olindo Romano and Rosa Bazzi, the couple who were finally sentenced for the massacre in Via Diaz, “may have been victims of a judicial error”. The request is the first possible review procedure for the process.

Tarfusser, and analysis of tips and documents provided by Olindo and Rosa’s defense, Take the three main tests upon which the conviction of those responsible for the massacre is based.

On the evening of December 11, 2006, they were murdered with sticks and knives in Arba at Diaz Road Court.Avila Castagna2 year old son Joseph Marzouk Child’s grandmother Paula Galli And the neighbor Valeria Cherubini. The latter’s husband was seriously injured. Mario Frigerio. Olindo Romano and Rosa Bazzi were finally sentenced to life in prison for the massacre.

Lawyer Defender Fabio Schembri Ready to apply Application for review of the process to the Court of Appeal of Bresciaresponsible for the request. In recent months he made a close in Milan. theL Tarvoser, in one chapter of 58 pages Born from the defense request (the contents of the review request were disclosed by Adnkronos) in turn requests Process review. For the prosecutor, “two likely victims of a miscarriage of justice are serving life sentences.”

To the magistrates of Brescia, Tarfuser requested “the examination of 57 technical consultants who have drafted and signed Technical advice on the methods, techniques and investigations they carried out and the results achieved by “and”No additional investigation considered useful and necessary for the purposes of decision-making based on truth and justice.” «Today – the document reads -, More than 17 years later, he learned – If this is recognized in the cancellation ruling – is fortunately able to provide for himself, but above all in combination with many decisive issues in deeds and not in deeds, in any case never evaluated, These scientific certainties are appropriate to make the three pillars of evidence collapse on which they relied on the life sentences of Olindo Romano and Rosa Pazzi ».

Kono Tarvoser He questions the three main pieces of evidence on which the conviction is based: Confessions of Rosa and Olindothe Confession of eyewitness Mario Frigerio and the blood spot Found on the doorstep of Olindo Romano’s car. “They’ve matured into it context that defining a patient is an exercise in euphemismwrites the plaintiff.

that of a witnessFor the page, that would be “false memory». Valeria Cherubini’s bloodstain on the doorstep of Olindo Romano’s car, for Tarfuser it would be Not evidence of guilt, but of innocence of couples. Finally, doubts about what confessions will be for Tarvoser «Acquiescence to false confessions».